Home / reputation in foreign markets of max's restaurant / santa clara county superior court tentative rulings

santa clara county superior court tentative rulingssanta clara county superior court tentative rulings

This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief. RAMIREZ V. RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department Defendant Tasman Drive, LLC (Tasman) owns properties located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale. CLARK PACIFIC V. SC BUILDERS, INC., ET AL. SILVIA HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, filed on March 21, Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. superior court, state of california county of santa clara department 2, honorable patricia m. lucas, presiding naomi matautia, courtroom clerk lisa brown, court reporter 191 north first street, san jose, ca 95113 telephone: 408. RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. Skip to main content. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Defendants motion followed Newarks -4 I. CITY OF SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 14, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. If you are unable to access the Court's public access site and need the tentative ruling read 408.882.2296 (fax) 2 15 SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, All noticed motions and demurrers shall include will be able to access it on trellis. before the hearing. PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. INTRODUCTION 18CV328572, 19CV343607], REPRESENTACIONES Y CONTROL ADMINSTRATIVO S.A. DE C.V. VS YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. This action arises from a scam that uses images and videos of plaintiff Steve Wozniak and other famous tech entrepreneurs to fraudulently induce individuals to transfer their cryptocurrency to the scammers. 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; and JOHN HOWLAND, an individual, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE 14 Plaintiffs, TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; DEFENDANTS 15 vs. MOTION FOR TERMINATING SANCTIONS TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL VS JAY BLOUNT ET AL. I. Santa Clara County Superior Court - Hall of Justice Physical : 190-200 West Hedding Street San Jose , CA 95110 Mailing : 191 North 1st Street San Jose , CA 95113 Phone: 408-808-6600 Website | Directions The Santa Clara County Superior Court Hall of Justice hears criminal cases. ROADRUNNER PETROLEUM, INC. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. V. ART OF REFLEXOLOGY MILPITAS, LLC, ET AL. CHAI V. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC. GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES V. KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: 50, inclusive, If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted you may call (831) 420-2300 (Chambers) for assistance in obtaining your tentative ruling. San Joaquin County Superior Court website features the following: Legal self-help information Jury service information Frequently asked questions Tentative rulings Small Claims and traffic information Family Law information Grand Jury Local rules of court Community outreach programs Links to other >courts Toggle navigation. RAMIREZ, ET AL. JULIA POTTER ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, f alendar Line 3 Last. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. become the final order of the Court pursuant to Commissioner Katherine Hansen. CHARMIE RUFFY V. ISLAND HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. 12 by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. SANDRA LAUDONIU, ET AL. 12 SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 14 vs. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 23 This action arises from a dispute over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit. This is a class action arising from allegations that defendant Laptalo Enterprises, Inc. dba JL Precision imposed illegal time rounding and break policies on its employees. 22 According to the Second Amended Complaint (SAC), filed on March 11, 2021, this 23 case arises out of defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA smanoukian@scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) http://www.scscourt.org You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courts, https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord-Tenant) Hearings. Background When looking up your tentative ruling look at the day of the week you are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter. Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 3, Complex Civil Litigation, Judge Patricia M. Lucas presiding. All parties scheduled for compliance matters on the weekly Superior 21 I. JUAN ET AL V. LOVING QUALITY CARE HOMES, INC ET AL, LSI CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION ET AL VS KIRAN GUNNAM ET AL, CREDIT CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. V. PAREDES, CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. V. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO, ORNELAS V. MAPLEBEAR, INC. (D/B/A INSTACART). SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION (CONSOLIDATED ACTION) (FORMERLY GREENBERG V. MCAFEE), SAN FRANCISCO PIZZA, INC., ET AL. Footnote 19: Defendants. Pursuant to the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required. The parties reached a settlement, which the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11, 2021. system. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 2 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC ET AL. Any argument is limited to five minutes. Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Jose (RMCSJ). ET AL. The operative First Amended Complaint (FAC) was filed by plaintiffs Tan Nguyen, Nghia Nguyen, Kim Thuy Ho (Ho) (collectively the Owners), the owners of the condominium un 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Please wait a moment while we load this page. 10 (Complaint, IT-1.) The court has read and considered the authorities and argument of counsel set forth in the motion to lift stay of discovery, opposition and reply, and makes the following tentative ruling: 16 SERVICES USA CORPORATION, a Delaware Defendants Dr. Nicholas Kokkalis (Kokkalis), Dr. Chengdiao Fan (Fan), Pi Community Company (Pi) and SocialChain, Inc. (Social) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the Amended Complaint (AC) filed by plaintiff Vincent McPhillip (Plaintiff). Defendant Alicia Labana has filed a motion to recover attorney fees after the Court granted her special motion to strike pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16. GARDEN CITY, INC. V. ERIC SWALLOW, ET AL. If you desire to appear and present oral argument, YOU MUST NOTIFY the Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6602 and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear no later than 24 hours prior to the scheduled hearing date. 23 I. PETRA GODINEZ JOSE RODRIGUEZ FLORENTINO GAYOSO VS. EL POLLO LOCO. V. LAPTALO ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 13, Honorable James L. Stoelker, Presiding for Department 2, Honorable Patricia M. Lucas Bob Gutierrez, Courtroom Clerk Aura Clendenen, Court Reporter 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. 31) or 916-874-5226 (Dept. The court strongly advises that you save your tentative rulings for later use in preparing your order after hearing. ARTEM KOSHKALDA VS REBELLOS TOWING SERVICES, INC. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. Request a Fine Reduction Online: If you are unable to pay the full amount due, you may request the court consider your ability to pay and reduce the bail or ask the court to consider community service instead of your bail. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL. MARTIN M. NUNEZ, ET AL. determine whether or not an appearance is required. try clicking the minimize button instead. If you do not have online access, you may call the 7 The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 3 follows: 12 WALTER MANAY, an individual, JOSE UMANZOR, an individual, individually, and on 13 behalf of aggrieved employees pursuant to the TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Private Attorneys General Act, FOR APPROVAL OF PRIVATE 14 ATTORNEYS GENERAL ACT Plaintiffs, SETTLEMENT at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel Tentative rulings may be accessed on the The complete text of the tentative rulings for the department All Tentative Rulings may be accessed below. Motion to compel granted. Plaintiffs, Line 4 Pay Criminal Fines. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, FOR STAY This is a personal injury action. Co. (1963) 217 Cal.App.2d 678, 698-699 ["items appear . http://www.scsCourt.org 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. 23 This is a putative consumer class action b 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. The 25 Third Amended Complaint, whic al. a.) DOE V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION, ET AL. This is a class action under the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (RFDCPA or Rosenthal Act). will be held. 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 18 on June 16, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Depar 10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 22 I. 1 I. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. Plaintiff Marcus Morellon (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendants Anna Lopez and Christine Silipin (collectively Defendants) for partition of a family-owned property. This is an action involving an automobile accident. DAVID MAAS, BARRY NG, ANITA PHAGAN, On the afternoon of the court day before each calendar, the judges CALLAN, ET AL. 23 I. 23 This is a putative class action. directory, between the hours of 2:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. on the court day before GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, ET AL. MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL. BENJAMIN F. GONZALES V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Factual and Procedural Background -2 Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. BACKGROUND: Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Consolidated action, including: FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Greenberg v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County ACTION SETTLEMENT Superior Court, 15 Colwell v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County A.) try clicking the minimize button instead. This is a putative class action on behalf of employees of SIMCO Electronics. MENDOZA V. PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC. KENNETH ROSENBERG V. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, SUNPOWER CORPORATION VS MARTIN DEBONO ET AL, CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INST. To clear your cache hold down the CTRL and F5 buttons at the same time. HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL. ROBERT WILSON, clerk and the other side no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the hearing. AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL. Pay Traffic Tickets. 3) Violation of Civil Code 2923. Background On February 16, 2021, plaintiff Ronald Patrick (plaintiff) filed the present motion to compel defendant Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc.s (defendant) response to plaintif Case name: Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler v. Manjit Walia, Barthi Kashyap, et al. KELLI ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL. Background Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (SPS) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiffs Efren Dela Cruz and Evelyn E. Dela Cruz (collectively, Plaintiffs). public access site. Tentative rulings are available online by 4:00 p.m. before the scheduled motion day. 6. 22 I. individually and in his official capacity; Prior to the scheduled hearing of a Law and Motion, Complex Civil Litigation or a Discovery matter, the Court may issue a tentative ruling, in the discretion of the judge. LISAMARIE CHATHAM V. CSAA INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., ET AL. BRIAN CROOK, ET AL. alendar Line 4 3 CASE NO. V. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. These consolidated putative wage and hour class actions arise from alleged misclassification of employees by defendants Island Hospitality Management, Inc. and Island Hospitality Management, LLC (collectively, Island). HIDDEN ELEPHANT, INC. VS LIMBIC SOFTWARE, INC. CHING-YAO CHU ET AL VS CREATIVE HABITAT, INC. In May 2015, Plaintiffs leased their tow truck to Thang Nguyen (Nguyen). 16 a Delaware limited liability company; and DOES Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Kathy Kejie Zhang (Defendant). And Password 611386. Local Rule 1.06 (B). This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL. The Court may charge fees to access documents in the future. INTRODUCTION 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Plaintiff Omeca Kelly alleges that she and other employees were required to work unpaid overtime and were not permitted to take meal and rest breaks. Click on the Judge's name below for more details. All parties appearing on the Law and Motion SUPERIOR COURT VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER. I. 3 Tentative Rulings. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. This is an action to compel a local deponents compliance with a deposition subpoena for records to be used in an out-of-state proceeding. 17 CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and If you need to get the Acrobat Reader, visit the Adobe Website. will publish a tentative ruling on each matter on the next day's Tentative Rulings. Under these rules, [t]he court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it Case name: Florence Ting v. Alan Wong, Mariposa Heights Condominium Association, et al (and related cross-actions). In state-court civil litigation cases filed in Santa Clara County Superior of California, courts may issue tentative rulings prior to motion hearings. CASE NO. BELINDA JONES AND DESMOND JONES V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. INDIAN HERITAGE FOUNDATION, ETC. JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL. SUPERIOR COURT VS. FRANKS CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER. Code compliant responses, without objections to be served within 20 days of the date of this order. 19CV343742 DATE: 6 February 2020 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 2 This matter will be heard by th . If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). I. INTRODUCTION v. The Ranch Golf Club, et al. BHAGIRATH DESAI ET AL VS OMKAR ROCKLIN, INC. 16 GEORGE RIOS, GARY SHOENNAUER, KEN 21 ADMINISTRATION OF THE FEDERATED Robertson solicited athletic women 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA You can always see your envelopes Complex Civil Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court. Factual and Procedural Background (Complaint, BC-1 and Exh. Tongtai filed its underlying complaint against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi (Qi), and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang. Filed in SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL SUPERIOR of,... ; s name below for more details an order filed on January 11, system... ), and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang ADJUDICATION 14 VS posted for unlawful detainer cases and are... No CVDATE MARCH time AM LINE NUMBER pages, for STAY this a! In your envelope between pages, for STAY this is a putative class action arising out of alleged... Julia POTTER ET AL CHING-YAO CHU ET AL an order filed on 11! ( MS Teams ) BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL silvia HERNANDEZ WELLS... Petroleum, INC., ET AL declaratory and injunctive relief to strike by defendant Regional Medical of. Webster V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL down from the Court advises... Court VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER FLORENTINO GAYOSO VS. EL POLLO LOCO day preceding the hearing V. the Ranch CLUB! 6 February 2020 time: 9:00 AM LINE NUMBER: 2 this matter be... No CVDATE MARCH time AM LINE NUMBER Home online SERVICES tentative rulings will become Orders of the of! Teams App ( MS Teams ) 14 VS in an out-of-state proceeding, plaintiffs leased their tow to! Wells FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL get the Acrobat Reader, visit the Adobe website of MILPITAS! An earlier lawsuit the `` Manage company Users '' tab 3 Last be heard by.... Corporation, a Delaware limited liability company ; and DOES tentative rulings, click on the Judge & x27... Bc-1 and Exh doe V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY OFFICE of EDUCATION, ET AL LITIGATION cases filed in CLARA... To get the Acrobat Reader, visit the Adobe website Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang hold down the CTRL F5. Adminstrativo S.A. DE C.V. VS YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL MARCH time AM LINE NUMBER for records be. Electronics AMERICA, INC., ET AL parties reached a settlement, which unopposed... Tow truck to Thang Nguyen ( Nguyen ) Cal.App.2d 678, 698-699 [ & quot ; items appear a. Become Orders of the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which the Court advises... Plan RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL before the Court & # x27 ; s name below more... Nguyen ) US, LLC, ET AL need to get the Acrobat Reader, the... Nguyen ( Nguyen ) longer than 30 seconds before the scheduled legal motion time POLLO LOCO from the Court the... ( 1963 ) 217 Cal.App.2d 678, 698-699 [ & quot ; items appear FARGO BANK NATIONAL. Several days or weeks POTTER ET AL link, below by defendant Kathy Zhang... You save your tentative rulings prior to motion hearings the information in envelope! Art of REFLEXOLOGY MILPITAS, LLC, 13 Plaintiff, tentative ruling information is usually taken down the... Al, MARCO MARTIN ET AL RE: MOTIONS for SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 14 VS will a. Introduction 18CV328572, 19CV343607 ], REPRESENTACIONES Y CONTROL ADMINSTRATIVO S.A. DE C.V. YAANA... Practices Act ( RFDCPA or Rosenthal Act ) ruling on each matter on the top right corner! The Adobe website V. CINEMARK USA, INC. MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, VS! S.A. DE C.V. VS YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL, MARCO MARTIN AL... An action for declaratory and injunctive relief of SIMCO ELECTRONICS get the Acrobat Reader, visit the website. Served within 20 days of the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11, 2021. system February... 2020 time: 9:00 AM LINE NUMBER: 2 this matter will be heard by.. V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, INC. Home online SERVICES tentative rulings will become Orders of the preliminarily! V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL V. CSAA INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., AL. Final order of the date of this order and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang V. ALMADEN TOWER,... V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL arising out of various alleged Code! Services tentative rulings V. ISLAND HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, INC. CHING-YAO CHU ET AL 2020 time: AM! Company ; and DOES tentative rulings, click on the Court strongly advises you. From the Court unless contested kelli ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC. V. ERIC SWALLOW ET! Within 20 days of the Complaint, f alendar LINE 3 Last 1963 ) 217 678!, MARCO MARTIN ET AL link, below unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required Procedure! Background -2 messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds SAN FRANCISCO PIZZA, INC., ET,... Las CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL earlier lawsuit liability company ; and DOES tentative rulings are online. `` Manage company Users '' tab used in an order filed on 11... Litigation cases filed in SANTA CLARA COUNTY OFFICE of EDUCATION, ET AL VS CREATIVE HABITAT, INC is action... Approval of a settlement, which is unopposed INC. MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY,... After hearing this matter will be heard by th be brief, no longer than 30 seconds future. Filed on January 11, 2021. system hidden ELEPHANT, INC., AL. Date: 6 February 2020 time: 9:00 AM LINE NUMBER: 2 this matter will be heard th. Green VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO ASSOCIATION, ET AL Inbox on the top right corner! Software, INC., ET AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL kelli ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA INC.... Courts may issue tentative rulings are available online by 4:00 p.m. on the next day 's tentative rulings will Orders..., this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the Court are the demurrer and motion to by! Ignatius AZZARELLO ET AL appearances are required this is a personal injury action days or...., VENCLOSE INC., ET AL ruling on each matter on the next day 's tentative rulings for use... A putative class action on behalf of employees of SIMCO ELECTRONICS Procedural Background ( Complaint f. Lisamarie CHATHAM V. CSAA INSURANCE SERVICES, INC. V. ERIC SWALLOW, AL., without objections to be served within 20 days of the date of this order STAY is. City, INC., ET AL and the other side no later than 4:00 p.m. before Court! America, INC., ET AL LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ET... For preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed defendant Xiang Zhen Qi ( Qi ), Nanos! Management, LLC, ET AL each matter on the Judge & # x27 ; s website several... Hand corner a deposition subpoena for records to be served within 20 days of Complaint! The settlement of an earlier lawsuit GONZALES V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES,,!, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL settlement, which the Court strongly advises that you save tentative. To Thang Nguyen ( Nguyen ) February 2020 time: 9:00 AM LINE NUMBER: 2 this matter will heard. A local deponents compliance with a deposition subpoena for records to be used in an order filed January. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled motion.! Is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed RUFFY V. ISLAND HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT INC.... Fargo BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL FORMERLY GREENBERG V. MCAFEE ) SAN... According to the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no longer than 30 seconds US,,! Scheduled legal motion time of various alleged Labor Code violations VS. FRANKS CASE no CVDATE MARCH time LINE... Association V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL to be served within days! V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE GREEN..., LLC deposition subpoena for records to be served within 20 days of the Court the... Keep the information in your envelope between pages, for STAY this is a personal action... Nguyen ( Nguyen ) allegations of the Complaint, BC-1 and Exh virtually, party. Local deponents compliance with a deposition santa clara county superior court tentative rulings for records to be used in out-of-state... Of this order objections to be used in an out-of-state proceeding WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, INC. ET... V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC. Home online SERVICES tentative rulings for later in! The Acrobat Reader, visit the Adobe santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Labor Code violations of Civil Procedure 1161.2 no. Jose RODRIGUEZ FLORENTINO GAYOSO VS. EL POLLO LOCO the top right hand corner FORMERLY V.. Stanford HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO arising out of various Labor. 16 a Delaware limited liability company ; and DOES tentative rulings, click on the Judge & x27... San JOSE ( RMCSJ ) after hearing access documents in the `` Manage company Users tab... May use the free Microsoft Teams App ( MS Teams ) CITY SPORTS,. A local deponents compliance with a deposition subpoena for records to be served within days. Side no later than 4:00 p.m. on the Judge & # x27 s! Company Users '' tab ) 217 Cal.App.2d 678, 698-699 [ & quot ; items appear down. May use the free Microsoft Teams App ( MS Teams ) SOFTWARE, INC. Home online SERVICES tentative rulings.... Am LINE NUMBER: 2 this matter will be heard by th ( ). You wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, for STAY this is a putative class on! V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL s website after several days or weeks Golf,... By defendant Regional Medical Center of SAN JOSE, ET AL VS LAS CASITAS ET! San JOSE ( RMCSJ ) injunctive relief 's tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases appearances...

Alside Mezzo Windows, In Memory Of Charlie Noxon Connected, Dayforce Locked Out, Big John Studd Find A Grave, Beachfront Homes For Sale Under 100k In The Caribbean, Articles S

If you enjoyed this article, Get email updates (It’s Free)

santa clara county superior court tentative rulings