fomapan 400 vs hp5

Fomapan gives a high contrast result in most situations, including even/overcast light. The contrast of a Fomapan 400 is going very high at higher iso rates. Ive seen Fomapan described as having a tabular grain structure, the same as found in Delta, T-Max, and Neopan lines of film, as well as C41. I think I spent less time editing my Tri-X shots in Lightroom after applying a basic curve in Photoshop, but I wouldnt say thats a good indication of film performance. For more articles on 35mmc about the subject matter discussed here, please click one of the following tag links: Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. B&H for B2B, Gov, Students & More. So which is the better film? An update here. I absolutely understand that for someone looking for a lower grain and more of a modern look the Fomapan emulsion isnt going to work, but then, I am not really sure that the Kentmere 400 would meet this requirement either neither of these films wins in that department. Rollei retro 400s/FX-39ii development time, Portra 400 35mm in-stock at Free Style (USA). But not everyone wants to limit this film to over-exposure and pull development. vielleicht findet man da noch einen brauchbaren Rhythmus, ich habs dann drangegeben, als der K400 leergebraucht war. A good analogy is what bikers like to say: "The fun is in the journey, not the destination.". Kentmere 400, exposed for the sky almost a perfect gradient from the top of the frame to the middle where it falls off into blown out territory. Lines are clean, and micro-contrast is maintained. (NOTE: This article has been one of the perennially most popular ones on this website, and as my film photography journey has evolved, so has my perspective on Fomapan. Sort: Order Added Price: lowest first Price: highest first Brand: A - Z Brand: Z - A Top Rated Clear All My previous pushing experiences with 400 speed films is with Tri-X and HP5+, both well known for their excellent latitude. There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts: Paid Subscription - 2.99 per month and youll never see an advert again! This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register. I shot both films at box speed, and didnt experience any issues. If thats the look youre going for, it may satisfy you, but I personally prefer Ilford Delta 100 for 35mm photography, and in terms of classic style emulsions, I even find that I prefer Kentmere 100 in 35mm to Fomapan. Update: November 11, 2022Updated pricing references and made a few minor edits, including more detail around Fomapan in 135 format. Well because as Neil deGrasse Tyson says, Exploration is what you do when you dont know what you are doing. den habe ich in D76 zu recht brauchbaren ergebnissen bringen knnen. Honestly, if money is that big an object or is the sole criteria, then just steal TMY2 or TriX. Fomapan 400 can also be used for street work in dull conditions or in areas where you want to show off a bit more crunch to go with urban decay. I buy all of my film from Analogue Wonderland.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-4','ezslot_11',181,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-4-0'); For more articles on 35mmc about the subject matter discussed here, please click one of the following tag links: Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. But dont limit yourself to those; it also sings in Kodak D-23. [] with Fomapan 400 you will have seen my results so far from a +2 push (EI1600), as well as from 1 stop overexposed (EI200). Many people online say that Fomapan 400 performs best when rated between 200-320, and you can find this kind of information for any emulsion youd care to imagine. You know what they basically said? Thank you Marius! document.getElementById("ak_js_1").setAttribute("value",(new Date()).getTime()); This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Unless you really zoom in on the scans I think that the Nikon lenses I shot these images on delivered excellent results, and the film drew that sharpness without adding too much character. However I think because of the grain structure I often perceive the Fomapan to have a little bit of an edge in sharpness. 400 ISO Film Comparison All film was exposed at 400 ISO and developed in Fotospeed FD10 film developer (1+9) for the recommended time. However the overall effect is actually quite muddy, and unpleasing to my eye, whereas the Fomapan in the same condition is undeniably less detailed, but results in a nicer image (in my opinion).if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[336,280],'35mmc_com-box-4','ezslot_11',182,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-4-0'); Kentmere 400, exposed for the dappled light. Id like to be able to shoot 400 speed films either dead on as much as possible, and to use the latitude when in tricky situations to go slightly under when necessary. The character of these films comes down to a combination of the above factors. And one further note here. Thank you Victor! Everything is personal preference, just If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. However it absolutely shines as a character film when over exposed I really do believe it to make more sense as a 200/300ish speed as many online similarly claim. Definitely worth the effort but definitely to save for the summer! I've managed to tame it a bit with homemade Microdol 1:3 BTW Although development is slow, like 25-30 minutes at 75F with 30 second agitation. Welche Zeiten hast du verwendet? Kentmere seems to be accurately rated at 400, and Ive never been inclined to shoot it over/under, or even to push or pull it. I take my results at 400 and, more often than not, am happy with them. Fomapan on the other hand seems underexposed when shot at box speed. Thanks to the compensating nature of TMax and Acufine and using a highly dilute (1+63) mix of Ilfotec HC. I bought some and tried it and it worked. Both are unique and can not replace the other. The landscape of Dungeness seems to suit that gritty-grainier look well; I like it more than I expected. I was reading an article that Simon King wrote on 35mmc where he shot fomapan 400 at 200. ob es der neue oder der alte APX400 war? I love Kentmete films for when I need to test a camera, lens, etc. First, a quick bit about the technical specs behind this comparison. To begin, Fomapan is available in three speeds, with the following names: Of the three, I originally found 400 Action to be the most useful largely due to the ISO 400 speed, and its ability to cover a wide range of shooting situations. I dont think this had anything to do with overexposure since my F100 is usually pretty consistent in matrix metering mode. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. But honestly, Fomapan 400 Action is nearly indistinguishable from the two slower speeds in terms of grain, contrast, and image quality. Simon, These are great! einmal hat sie es geschafft, mich vom Kippen abzuhalten und der Film wurde einfach irgendwie gekippt ohne Uhr. To learn more, check-out the About page, or read News for the latest. Upload or insert images from URL. Das braucht nicht viel Platz. Except that if things go wrong then the monetary loss is greater with the more expensive film. Hi Simon,thanks for the comparison. Warum den AGFA-Rhythmus? Ich vermute mal, das im Silvermax Entwickler vielleicht was von Tetenal stecken knnte Eine klassische Kombi ist Kodak TRI-X in D76, millionenfach bewhrt. The images made with that extra stop of light were enough to allow me to settle for [], [] The images above all felt under exposed. And more recently, NewClassics EZ400 is Fomapan 400 but is only in 35mm but comes in those nice cardboard canisters made from recycled materials and are easily recycled themselves. It may not display this or other websites correctly. The Kentmere also shows a little halation, but only when the light is very concentrated and higher than a few stops from what Im exposing for. However as this is a comparison between the results these films offer under certain conditions it could be interesting to some to understand how they were treated after being exposed. Notify me of follow-up comments by email. sowohl Altbestnde APX400TS von 1996 (oder so) als auch frische Versandware habe ich so verarbeitet. Filling the Gap Photography & Mental Health. Fibonawak 8 mo. Sometimes this grittiness fits your subject - Ill often choose Tri-X when shooting at former military bases because of the grain alone. Kentmere 400 is probably the film for you. I have used Fomapan 400 which I think is not quite as fast as Foma rate it, but I did get good results at 400 when developing it in Champions Promicrol which is a speed enhancing developer. Can you talk about what developers you used? Thank you. document.getElementById("ak_js_1").setAttribute("value",(new Date()).getTime()); This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers; Press?? However due to my slow shooting style I didnt have these images ready in any kind of timeframe that would make sense, and have since shot a number of rolls of both, which has given me a little more to talk about. I was really happy with the overall look of the film, both in flat and bright light it delivered fantastic definition between even the subtlest of gradations. You can see the loss of highlight at the top of the frame, but there are more shades of grey that are maintained. Much brighter on the figure, much darker on areas not touched by light. I like the old-fashioned look of Foma films, here Fomapan 200 Creative: Camera: Mamiya C330 Professional. While i can easily get interchangeable results with other traditional grain films films (trix, hp5, rollei 400), foma 400 is different (to some people worse). But for some, $20 is a big deal. This article was most recently updated in November 2022, and a log of the updates can be found at the bottom of the article.). It has a unique feel and look. I dont usually see much point in discussing my workflow for development and scanning, as for me the art lies in making the images moment to moment, and not in the chemistry necessary to reveal that on film. Fomapan 400 is a black and white negative film that has a very unique look. Trying to choose between black and white films can often feel like trying to understand the difference between cappuccino, latte or a flat white. HP5+ is an exemplary film, and definitely worth the extra cost. Notice the lost detail in both the figure and the highlight of the water. Ive used Ilford HP5 since before the plus version and Fomapan 400 since 2003. Working on a budget? All photographs and text appearing on 35mmc.com are the exclusive property of the named author (except where stated otherwise) and are protected by copyright. I mentioned in the Workflow section that the bulk of work shown was in either DDX or Fujifilm chemistry. Ansel Adams did good tree work. Ill soon be trying it at box and slightly overdeveloping it at a high temperature to see if I can achieve similar results to overexposing it by one stop. Although I wouldnt However I think there are some quite distinguished features to the grains of these films that should remain constant regardless of the technique used. The recurring points here pretty much nail it: HP5+ is a more consistently quality film that pushes much better. Thanks again for another informative article. It has lower dynamic range, and must be treated carefully regardless of what its being shot at. As of October 2021, Tri-X will run you $9.95 a roll for 36 exposures. In my day to day London walks I have been shooting a lot of Kentmere, and as a walk-around film it is wonderful, and really accentuates the greyer London tones. Quote; When I started my photo education in the late 1960s, I was fortunate to be taught by working newspaper photographers. A thorough article and greatly appreciated. All photographs and text appearing on 35mmc.com are the exclusive property of the named author (except where stated otherwise) and are protected by copyright. Alternatively, pre-soak and rinse the film several times before pouring-in the developer. I tried (semi-succesfully) push foma200 1 stop in rodinal and its definitely also worth checking out, the foma200 film gives (imo) better results than the 400. And while you cannot buy D-23, you can buy it in kits from Photographers formulary or mix it up yourself. But as is the case of any fickle film, you have to develop it right. Kentmere is better in general, more dynamic range. Find out more about 35mmc here. Especially if Im working at a reenacting event. The Kentmere is the real all rounder. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. That stuff came in handy as I dabbled in that artsy stuff. . All photos were given the same amount of sharpening and then inverted after cleaning up any lingering dust with the spot healing tool. Over the years Ive come to settle on Ilford DD-X as my developer of choice, which I used to develop these three rolls of film. Grundstzlich passt auch jetzt alles in den Schrank, doch ordentlich ist das nicht. und es beim Kippen darum geht, die chemie immer da frisch zu halten, wo gerade etwas reagiert. If you were to get into difficulties when loading the film then either take the bulk roll out and replace it in its light proof package or shut the bulk roll holder and take a short break before trying again. Also, Fomapan 400 is a film that shines in certain situations and conditions and if youre looking for a specific look and feel to your black & white images. Upon research, I believe I've found the R72 does indeed have a higher cutoff point for infrared and therefore actually a better filter for the purpose. den habe ich in D76 zu recht brauchbaren Ich benutze zu 95% D76, fr einen APX 100 (alt) ab und zu Rodinal, obwohl der in D76 auch sehr schn kommt. Also lieber bei 18 oder 19 Grad etwas lnger entwickeln. https://emulsive.org/reviews/film-review-fomapan-400-arista-edu-ultra-400, https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/7822-REG/B_W_65072240_39mm_Infrared_Dark_Red.html, https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/23077-REG/Hoya_B55RM72_55mm_R72_Infrared_Glass.html. end of the spectrum compared to Ilford and Kodak offerings, but also because I think it performs better than its price point. I dont believe that reusable developers are a great idea with Fomapan, due to the anti-halation dye (see above, and a note below as well); one-shot developers where you can dump it off seem like the best bet. Give good old Kodak Tri-X a workout. I tried Foma 400 and to be honest, I am not happy with it. I want to try the films out myself now. und dabei kommt es eben darauf an, die flssige chemie zu verteilen. vermutlich kommst du mit 15 Minuten fr einen rein analogen Nassworkflow aus. And while it does perform better and is a little more accessible to more people, I still think that the film does an amazing job as a 400-speed film. It will also mean that I can make a few comparisons to other, higher end 400 speed films, as they fill roughly the same space. As I mentioned earlier, the film performs the best when over-exposed by a stop or a little less than a stop, but that shouldnt stop you from shooting it as the box speed of ASA-400. The Pen EE has not arrived yet.. If youve enjoyed my photographs here I have a larger selection available onmy Instagram, from all different kinds of films and projects. I only used three cassettes of Fomapan 400 in 135 because shot outside I found it quite grainyhowever shots I made indoors under low light in a church and a museum looked really good. Yep, there are many reviews of Foma 400 on the net, and they often say that, shot at box speed and developed as recommended, its grainy, contrasty and lacks shadow detail, which is what pushed film looks like.I shoot a lot of it, all at 200. Fr ihn rume ich das Labor gerne, Welcome, dear visitor! Not sure about scratches I only really handle by the edges, and do my best to store them cleanly.Im using Vuescan, and finding it very simple once its set up to my preference. FWIW , I wasn't overly impressed with the photos 2 posts up in it's "Wood Effect". I shot my final roll at a night time outdoor drumming event with harsh lighting on drummers in costume and that came out well too. The developer shouldnt matter too much for this kind of process, any will do.The scanner I use is a Plustek 8100. 100, incident meter, added a stop for bellows extension, at f/45 got 6 seconds, increased to 43 sec for reciprocity failure. I see this as a good film for those who want to photograph historical events like World War Two or similar mid-century conflict reenactment. I decided to give Fomapan 400 a try after discovering that it is exactly the same price as Kentmere 400. 35mmc is a blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers. One word of caution when scanning Kentmere films with flatbed scanners like the Epson V600 or V800 - be very careful with the Unsharp Mask. If I could only have one it would be the Ilford for its bulletproof reliability. This post was inspired by another I made back in the early days of my website, a post from October 2017 titled Kentmere 400 | Budget B&W Film. for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers Its all about developing the film correctly and leaning into developers that can help reduce some of the less desirable aspects of the film stock. As a winter/autumn all rounder the Kentmere is serving me well, and Fomapan as a high-light film makes a lot of sense. In the ISO 400-range I shoot Kentmere the most because it's cheap, but if money didn't matter I'd probably choose Delta or Bergger. I quit shooting Fomapan 400 because it was so scratch prone for me.Also, whats your Plustek workflow like Im thinking of ditching silverfast for vuescan, Im hearing vuescan makes for more neutral images because silverfast always wants to employ negafix profiles and rubbish like that (half the films I shoot dont even have a negafix profile). Let me start by tell you Im surprised at the cost of film in the UK. Fomapan is a film I tried when I first started out, but I was undertaking the learning curve of a film camera as well as film itself, and this meant that my results were not ideal. I am interested in contrast in less than optimal conditions, and the detail were able to pull out of specifically the darker areas of the image. Mixing the ID-11 and waiting 24 hours to use it was getting old. Fomapan 400, metered for the wall on the right. I recently wrote a 5 Frames With Fomapan 400 where I described the results shot at EI1600 with a 2 stop push. Hopefully this will be apparent when you look at the images below, which you can click on to get a closer look. I disagree that Fomapan 400 is garbage, but it is very different to HP5+. The contrast, larger grain, and character is the best Ive found at this price point. Why experiment with something new when I am comfortable with Kentmere? und das, obwohl sie weder Ahnung von Fotografie noch von Chemie hat). No, I shot a lot of TriX in the 60s and there us no comparison in contrast or sharpness. The detail of well exposed for highlights on Fomapan is less refined, and sometimes seem a little harsh even when Im certain they were correctly exposed for. du hast freie Wahl: - mit Rodinal 1+50 fr gute Empfindlichkeitsausnutzung bis 640 ASA, Schrfe und normale Kontraste, (aber mitunter lange Entwicklugszeiten, die beim Agfakipprhythmus anstrengend werden), - mit Rodinal 1+100 fr hnlich gute Ergebnisse bei weiger Bewegungsarbeit fr den Arm in der (semi-)Standentwicklungund sparsamerer Ausnutzung der chemie, - mit Atomal49 fr schne Grauwerte aber nur bis 320 ASA und etwas weniger scharf, dafr weicheres Korn, - mit D76 fr Nennempfindlichkeit und etwas krzere Entwicklugnszeiten, - mit Rodinal 1+25 um den 60er-Jahre Zeitungsfoto-vintagelook mit ordentlich Korn und knackigen Kontrasten wiederzubeleben. Very different animals. Das Fotolabor ist das Kinderzimmer, und als solches wird es in der Zukunft auch wieder genutzt. Fomapan 400 is the fastest emulsion in Foma Bohemias line of films. See if you can guess which is which in the comments! These films are reasonably similarly priced, at around 25 for a pack of 5x 36-shot rolls at time of writing. Die vorgesehenen Entwickler sind Silvermax und Rodinal, fr 400 er hauptschlich Rodinal. Processed in Legacy Pro L-110 (HC110 knock off) 1:40 from concentrate, 12 min at 19 deg. Clocking in at $5.19 a roll for 36 exposures as of October 2021, this is the lest expensive film I shot for this comparison. Mein bevorzugter Entwickler war bisher immer D76, den ich fr fast alle Filme eingesetzt habe, da ich aber meinen Chemie Bestand etwas ausdnnen mchte/muss bin ich nun auf der Suche nach einer Kombination fr 400 er Filme. And believe me, they are crummy. Thanks Peter!I deliberately chose frames with similar tones so it would be a bit trickier.The one of the left is the Fomapan. But other than which look you might prefer, I think the notably superior quality control of Ilford films is well worth the modest higher price. I like the compositions of your sample images a lot. Get a free Kentmere 35mm film when you use my invite link!http://i.refs.cc/r7yZ7EEe In this video I shoot my first roll of Fomapan 400 Black and White das wird 60er Schleifpapier mit viel Charakter aber ohne Grauwerte. Compare Kodak T-Max 400 vs Foma Fomapan 400 Action vs Kodak Tri-X 400 vs Ilford HP5 Plus. Is that the new Jane Bond? 5x7 Fomapan 200 at e.i. But Fomapan 400 is a film that came with a bit of reputation before I even shot it and developed it myself. Character is quite a subjective measurement, and different people will assess different qualities when discussing it. APX is the opposite and pushes very well. Id probably let it sit in the developer a little longer next time.Regardless of the negative density, the results speak for themself - just look at the detail in the chrome of the motorcycle pictured below.

Banana Peel For Seborrheic Keratosis, Food Challenges In Colorado Springs, Azul Beach Resort Negril Cancellation Policy, Texas Game Warden Rank Structure, Articles F